<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:13:31 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>ButteredPopcorn</title><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>REVIEW: 'Predators' casts big names, rehashes same ol' story.</title><category>Reviews</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:08:21 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2010/7/26/review-predators-casts-big-names-rehashes-same-ol-story.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:8364677</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="thumbnail-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><a href="javascript:showFullImage('/display/ShowImage?imageUrl=%2Fstorage%2Fpost-images%2FPredators-Poster_2-535x779.jpg%3F__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION%3D1280369367481',779,535);"><img src="http://lancegilbert.com/storage/thumbnails/4802709-7906352-thumbnail.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1280369404857" alt="" /></a></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 252px;">Photo credit: 20th Century Fox</span></span>As a sci-fi fan, it is easy to get all excited about another <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093773/"><em>Predator</em></a><em> </em>movie. The franchise has been around awhile, and definitely appeals to a niche group who enjoys watching humans fight to survive while being hunted by an overpowering species who collects their skulls as trophies. And most of these fans reminisce about the first <em>Predator</em> movie that featured a buff <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000216/">Arnold Schwarzenegger</a> (representing the human race at its physical best) take on a single Predator (representing the alien species at its worst). Unfortunately, <em><a href="http://www.predators-movie.com/">Predators</a></em> gives us a replay of exactly what made the series appealing in the first place, but fails to introduce enough new material to keep the movie interesting.</p>
<p>If we take the first <em>Predator</em> movie and replace Schwarzenegger with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004778/">Adrien Brody</a>, and then change the setting from a jungle on Earth to a similar looking jungle environment on an alien game reserve, then you have an idea of what <em>Predators</em> is about. Granted, a few things have changed. Such as the introduction of alien "dogs" that engage in the hunt, and some additional details about a clan battle within the Predator species. But these few changes seem like a desperate attempt to convince people that the film makers really didn't rehash the same ol' story from the first <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093773/">Predator</a></em> movie. And just like the first movie, this film relies on a high profile cast (for the most part) to carry the movie. But any avid film fan knows that throwing a group of well-known actors into a film with a script that does not take advantage of their talents just leads to disappointment.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-8364677.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>"Splice" pleases sci-fi fans, weirds out normal people.</title><category>Reviews</category><category>Reviews</category><category>Sci-Fi</category><category>Splice</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:22:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2010/6/5/splice-pleases-sci-fi-fans-weirds-out-normal-people.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7875550</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: right;" title="splicetrio.jpg" src="http://lancegilbert.com/resource/splicetrio.jpg?fileId=7216542" border="0" alt="splice" hspace="3" vspace="3/" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>(Photos credit: Warner Bros. Entertainment)</p>
<p>The idea of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_splicing">genetic engineering</a> has been a subject that scientists have been struggling with for quite some time. Some see the benefits of such research. Others see it as man's God complex. <a href="http://www.splicethefilm.com/">Splice</a> is a movie that deals with the moral and emotional complications of advancements in science that include splicing human DNA with that of other animals to create beneficial proteins that can cure many of man's devastating diseases.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004778/">Adrien Brody</a> (Clive Nicoli) and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001631/">Sarah Polley</a> (Elsa Kast) play two ambitious scientists who find themselves in a moral and legal quandary when they bend and then break the rules to blaze ahead with their genetic research by mixing animal DNA with human DNA. Their goal is to find a protein that is key to fighting many diseases. But by breaking the rules, they find that they have created a hybrid being with unexpected behaviors.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7875550.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Empire Strikes Back : Ars Technica's look back at the best science fiction film of all time</title><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 13:26:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2010/5/21/the-empire-strikes-back-ars-technicas-look-back-at-the-best.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7742370</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://lancegilbert.com/storage/post-images/empire?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1280370145386" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><em>Image: 20th Century Fox</em></p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/05/empire-strikes-30-ars-looks-back-at-an-amazing-film.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">An excellent look back at the classic film on it's 30th Anniversary</a>. The bad guys won, and it ended up being the best film in the&nbsp;<a href="http://starwars.com/">original Star Wars trilogy</a>﻿. The dark tension of the film completely defined the internal conflict faced by Luke Skywalker as he faced Darth Vader, and I think it had a profound effect on society as a modern tale of myth.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">The film is jet black in tone. Luke lost the only person he knew that connected him to his father, and to the legacy of the Jedi Knights, when Obi-Wan was struck down by Vader in&nbsp;<em>A New Hope</em> (or as older Ars staffers still refer to it,&nbsp;<em>Star Wars</em>). Han Solo is biding his time with the rebels before leaving to return to his life of being a professional smuggler and scoundrel; the bounty on his head is becoming too much to bear. The rebels may have destroyed the Death Star, but they're still undersupplied and on the run, holed up on a frozen hell of a planet. Darth Vader is scouring space to find them, and he seems oddly preoccupied with a young pilot named Luke Skywalker. It only goes downhill from there.﻿</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><em><a href="http://starwars.com/movies/episode-v/">The Empire Strikes Back</a></em>. What a classic.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/05/empire-strikes-30-ars-looks-back-at-an-amazing-film.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">Check out Ars's in-depth look back HERE.</a></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7742370.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>'The Wolfman' hits theaters February 12, 2010.</title><category>Movie News</category><category>Trailers</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:55:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2009/10/1/the-wolfman-hits-theaters-february-12-2010.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7179831</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>UPDATE: </em><span style="font-weight: normal;">Release date has been changed to February 12, 2010.</span></strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.thewolfmanmovie.com/">The Wolfman</a> has been scheduled for release on February 12, 2010, with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001125/">Benicio Del Toro</a> in the lead role and such greats as <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0915989/">Hugo Weaving</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000164/">Sir Anthony Hopkins</a> in supporting roles. I'm excited about this movie because of its excellent casting and (I have to admit) it's perfectly eerie style. The trailer certainly does an excellent job of building anticipation for this classic remake. One thing is for sure -- I have scheduled this release date into my calendar!</p>
<p>View trailer <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS02xaTIdRI ">HERE!</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7179831.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland; faces possible extradiction to U.S.</title><category>Movie News</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:24:59 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2009/9/27/roman-polanski-arrested-in-switzerland-faces-possible-extrad.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7179832</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a title="View '27polanski2-600' on Flickr.com" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10055895@N07/3960337489"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2526/3960337489_949a4cf7d9_m.jpg" border="0" alt="27polanski2-600" hspace="3" vspace="3/" width="240" height="132" align="right" /></a></p>
<p>Arranged by prosecutors in Los angeles and Washington, Swiss authorities arrested director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000591/">Roman Polanski</a> late Saturday (Sept. 26, 2009) as he arrived at the Zurich airport. Polanski was scheduled to receive an award at the Zurich Film Festival.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7179832.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>REVIEW: 'District 9' is proof that you don't need a big budget to produce one of the best movies of the year!</title><category>Reviews</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:05:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2009/8/20/review-district-9-is-proof-that-you-dont-need-a-big-budget-t.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7179843</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 3px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3446/3840733945_a11045ef4a.jpg" border="0" alt="district-9-poster" width="183" height="270" align="right" />At first glance, it may appear that <a href="http://www.district9movie.com/"><em>District 9</em></a> is just another sci-fi action movie about scary aliens who come to Earth. I mean, how many times have we seen this played out on the big screen? Who could get psyched up about a low-budget ($30 million) sci-fi movie starring a no-name lead actor (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1663205/">Sharlto Copley</a>)? Haven't we had enough of predictable sci-fi movies? Well, brace yourselves everyone. <em><a href="http://www.district9movie.com/">District 9</a></em> may not be what you are expecting.<br /><br />The biggest draw for this movie has been a very well-made trailer (see below), and the fact that Peter Jackson is producing.  But trust me when I say that the trailer does not tell you the whole story. And quite frankly, you will see that this movie is about much more than what the trailer reveals.<br /><br />]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7179843.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Ridley Scott attached to direct 'Alien' prequel.</title><category>Movie News</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:40:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2009/8/4/ridley-scott-attached-to-direct-alien-prequel.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7179854</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a title="View 'ridley_scott_cam' on Flickr.com" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10055895@N07/3788713985">
<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2461/3788713985_2dd69ba0a9.jpg" border="0" alt="ridley_scott_cam" width="500" height="331" /></div>
</a><br /></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118006722.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">Variety</a>, <a href="http://www.foxmovies.com/">Twentieth Century Fox</a> is planning to revive it's 'Alien' franchise by releasing a prequel film that takes place before the 1979 classic '<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_(film)">Alien</a>'. This, of course, is news in itself. But the BIG news is that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000631/">Ridley Scott</a> (who directed the original film) has been signed on to direct this prequel! There were three sequels to the original film, but this is the first time Scott has agreed to direct one. This should be good!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Read the Variety report <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118006722.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">HERE!</a><br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7179854.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>'Watchmen' returns to theaters with 25 minutes of extra footage.</title><category>Movie News</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:29:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2009/6/30/watchmen-returns-to-theaters-with-25-minutes-of-extra-footag.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7179865</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a title="View 'watchmenkiss' on Flickr.com" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10055895@N07/3211340884"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3300/3211340884_fa40a419b9_m.jpg" border="0" alt="watchmenkiss" hspace="3" vspace="3/" width="240" height="161" align="left" /></a><br /></p>
<p>As if <a href="http://watchmenmovie.warnerbros.com/">Watchmen</a> wasn't long enough, it looks like <a href="http://www.warnerbros.com/#/page=home&amp;asset=070816/My_Sisters_Keeper_-_In_Theaters_June_26&amp;type=video/">Warner Bros.</a> is looking to cash in by releasing a Director's Cut of the film in July, one week before the DVD &amp; Blu-ray releases. The new version will include 25 minutes of extra footage that extends the film's runtime to just over 3 hours!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I always felt the film was a bit too long in its original version, but it looks like <a href="http://www.warnerbros.com/#/page=home&amp;asset=070816/My_Sisters_Keeper_-_In_Theaters_June_26&amp;type=video/">Warner Bros.</a> is expecting the die-hard fans to come back and see this Director's Cut. According to the post on the <a href="http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/06/25/watchmen-returning-to-theaters-in-july-with-25-minutes-of-extra-footage/">MTV Movies Blog</a>, this new version is going to be more graphic and violent. But over three hours? The first film had a pretty slow pace at times, so I fear that the patience of the audience may run thin. But then again, the die-hard Watchmen fans will most likely appreciate a longer, more graphic version.  We'll have to see.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Check out the entire post on <a href="http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/06/25/watchmen-returning-to-theaters-in-july-with-25-minutes-of-extra-footage/">MTV's Movie Blog</a> <a href="http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/06/25/watchmen-returning-to-theaters-in-july-with-25-minutes-of-extra-footage/">here</a>, and check out the new <a href="http://watchmenmovie.warnerbros.com/">Director's Cut of Watchmen</a> in July if you have the patience.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7179865.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>How are movies converted to IMAX format?</title><category>Uncategorized</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:56:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2009/5/29/how-are-movies-converted-to-imax-format.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7179876</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5250780/how-regular-movies-become-imax-films"><img class="aligncenter" title="IMAX" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3652/3576368111_fdf0521818_o.jpg" alt="" width="504" height="336" /></a></p>
<p><br /><em>(Photo credit: Gizmodo.com)</em><br /><br />I came across a very <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5250780/how-regular-movies-become-imax-films">geeky and interesting post on Gizmodo</a> today, and I had to share it with everyone here on butteredpopcorn.net. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5250780/how-regular-movies-become-imax-films">This Giz post</a> explains the technical details of IMAX film (as well as standard 35mm movie film), and how movies are transfered over to the awesome IMAX format. So now you can say you technically know why IMAX is as awesome as it is.&nbsp; Enjoy!<br /><br /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5250780/how-regular-movies-become-imax-films">Full Gizmodo post HERE!</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7179876.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>REVIEW: J.J. Abrams refreshes 'Star Trek' by boldly going where it hasn't gone before.</title><category>Reviews</category><dc:creator>Lance Gilbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/2009/5/21/review-jj-abrams-refreshes-star-trek-by-boldly-going-where-i.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">433009:6358854:7179887</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0 none; margin: 3px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3333/3551915189_4bc3efc9a8.jpg" border="0" alt="star_trek_xi_ver18_xlg" width="270" height="400" align="right" />Not everyone is a <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/index.html">Star Trek</a> fan. And many (<a href="http://www.aiohq.com/images/nathan/StarWars.jpg">Star Wars fans</a>, I'm looking at you!) have purposefully avoided anything <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/index.html">Star Trek</a> related, for fear of having their <a href="http://www.starwars.com/fans/hyperspace/">Hyperspace Membership</a> revoked and their "I Love George Lucas" t-shirts taken away. But regardless of where your sci-fi allegiance lies, there is no denying what <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0009190/">J.J. Abrams</a> has managed to accomplish with the recently released <a href="http://www.startrekmovie.com/"><em>Star Trek</em></a> film.<br /><br />I grew up as a MAJOR <a href="http://starwars.com/movies/episode-iv/"><em>Star Wars</em></a> fan, but I also appreciated the view of the possible future that <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/index.html">Star Trek</a> offered us. Sure, the TV series was a little hokie at times (o.k., a lot of times!), but it definitely broke new ground in the world of Sci-Fi and created a cult classic with characters that everyone remembers. But as the franchise grew and expanded, it lost some steam. And eventually offered fans little to look forward to. It became very apparent that the <em><a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/index.html">Star Trek</a></em> franchise was in dire need of a refresh.<br /><br />]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lancegilbert.com/movies/rss-comments-entry-7179887.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
